Deloitte Survey Reveals Managing Risk from Global Currency Fluctuations Key Challenge for Corporate Treasurers

With currency shifts making a significant impact on company profits, Deloitte surveyed 133 global corporations on the challenges that 2016 will present in managing currency risk effectively. Over half (56 percent) of respondents to the 2016 Global foreign exchange (FX) survey report that lack of visibility and reliability of FX forecasts is the biggest challenge in managing FX risk.

The lack of visibility could stem from the fact that nearly one third (31 percent) of corporations rely on three or more sources to identify exposures.

“If you can’t see it, you can’t manage it. Without accurate measurement, value erosion from negative currency rate movements can’t be anticipated or prevented. The challenges in reporting on FX risk have always been around but as companies become ever more international, and a period of relative calm in the FX markets has turned unsettled, this is likely to have an even greater impact,” said Karlien Porre, partner in Deloitte UK’s Global Treasury Advisory Services practice. “How can strategies be developed effectively if the exposure risk information is not being used to shape year-on-year performance as opposed to just the here-and-now? Only 11 percent of those surveyed cited managing year-on-year financial performance as a primary hedging objective.”

While more than half of respondents (63 percent) feel that the board and executives receive sufficient information on FX exposure and risk management, only 41 percent report tracking impact on gross margin and other profitability measures such as earnings per share impact.

Nearly a quarter (21 percent) of respondents do not track FX risk management performance at all. Contributing to the challenge of identifying FX exposures is the lack of automation with 62 percent of survey respondents indicating that they use manual forecasts. In fact, inaccurate forecasts, poor communication on changes in the forecasts, and non-transparent exposures make up the top-three sources of ineffectiveness in managing FX risk

“Chances are you are going to hedge less if you don’t believe the forecasts. The survey findings show a direct correlation between levels of automation and confidence in these forecasts. Manual information and processes cause late and unreliable forecasts. Therefore corporate treasurers need to share these challenges with executives and global teams, along with a recommendation for investment in the tools and technology to alleviate the problem,” added Niklas Bergentoft, director at Deloitte & Touche LLP, Global Treasury Advisory Services for Deloitte Advisory.

“Conversely, boards should push back on treasurers for greater visibility into stress tests, better staple reporting, and more complex analysis. Companies could be taking a hit now by not supporting the need for treasury’s roles to change.”

The findings of Deloitte’s 2016 Global Foreign Exchange Survey are consistent with the results of the 2015 Corporate treasury survey where the need for better systems to bring exposure visibility and management of FX risk to the attention of boards was a key challenge a year ago. This year’s survey also covers effectiveness of centralized and decentralized models, hedging strategies and transaction exposures, and was created in response to recent FX volatility impact on businesses.

About Deloitte Advisory
Deloitte Advisory helps organizations turn critical and complex business issues into opportunities for growth, resilience, and long-term advantage. Our market-leading teams help our clients manage strategic, financial, operational, technological, and regulatory risk to maximize enterprise value, while our experience in mergers and acquisitions, fraud, litigation, and reorganizations helps clients move forward with confidence.

About Prof Janek Ratnatunga 1129 Articles
Professor Janek Ratnatunga is CEO of the Institute of Certified Management Accountants. He has held appointments at the University of Melbourne, Monash University and the Australian National University in Australia; and the Universities of Washington, Richmond and Rhode Island in the USA. Prior to his academic career he worked with KPMG.
Scroll to Top